3/4/2007 1:25 AM Hi Thomas,
TF> Here is a wish for v4: Please let us use external editors. This wish TF> came up first, I think, already during v1 times. I do need to reply in TF> HTML to some messages in the office, and the TB! HTML editor produces TF> embarrasing results (starting from that blue line at the left). As the TF> advantages of HTML mails (mostly fomratting issues) are used by more TF> and more people, and hence my need for replies in HTML increases, I am TF> considering installing something like Eudora Free on my computer, just TF> for replies in HTML. TF> Yes, I know Eudora uses the Outlook HTML engine. Ideally, TB! would TF> have an option to do the same. TF> To all anti-HTML gurus: I'm in business, and I'm communicating with TF> customers, so please hold back your philosophy. That's another TF> dicussion which can be held on TBOT. Thanks. Why do you bother with TB? There are plenty of HTML alternatives. I too am in business communicating with customers around the world. I am also in the business of educating them. I teach them to create PDF attachments with OpenOffice or PagePlus as superior alternatives to HTML when formatting is necessary. The US Dept. of Defense has banned HTML and Microsoft email clients and for good reason. Don't you even suggest that we turn TB into the same crap. "Being in business" is _no_ excuse for adulterating TB! If you want to jump in the lake and drown, do it. Don't take anyone else with you. History proves 80% of the people are wrong 80% of the time. I want to remain with the 20%. -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.98.03 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
