On Friday, April 13, 2007, 11:25:03 AM, Vili wrote: > In professional environment it is not reliable, that is the > right term. Joe and Randy already explained it with more words.
I have found it very reliable. In a professional environment. I am sorry that it does not treat deleted mails differently, but lately I can't even say that I have noticed count problems. I haven't seen any lost mails. I use a local outbox, and have since the beginning so I have no idea whether there is a problem with the server side outbox. I don't have crashes, I don't have any shutdowns, resource hogging. I am a a heavy user, right now I have 8 or ten programs running and I so there are plenty of chances for problems if software has conflicts or large appetites for resources. My current usage at fastmail is 372m/600m volume of mail. I try to keep usage trimmed down so I regularly archive mail from IMAP to a dummy account in TB! Bandwidth usage is always minimal. I'd say that I am very pleased with my IMAP experience with TB! I do all my filtering server side, so I no longer am making any use of what was in my eyes always TB!s strongest feature. -- Dwight A. Corrin 928 S Broadway Wichita KS 67211 316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568 dcorrin at fastmail.fm Using IMAP with The Bat! 3.98.10 on Windows XP version 5,1 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.98.11 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
