On Sat 2-Jun-07 10:49am -0600, Peter Kerekes wrote: > Saturday, June 2, 2007, 10:54:08 AM, you wrote: > Stuart>> Hello Peter, Stuart>> A reminder of what Peter Kerekes typed on: Stuart>> Saturday, June 02, 2007 at 10:44:48 GMT -0400 > PK>>> I upgraded to the new version, (unpaid). however found much more errors PK>>> than in the old version. > PK>>> False positive was about 0.1% false negative around 1%. Now I find a large PK>>> number of false negatives, for mail which is has a filter to go to certain PK>>> folders (such is tbot and others). Suddenly a large number of messages are PK>>> filtered to junk mail. > PK>>> After seeing this I put an address in the whitelist of the Antispamsniper's PK>>> filtering system. It still filters it to junk mail. > PK>>> I don't think I suppose to retrain the upgraded version. Why do I have this PK>>> problem? How can I resolve it? Can I go back to the previous version without PK>>> destroying my trained data file? > PK>>> If this is not the right forum could someone direct me there. > Stuart>> You may want to go here for some answers: www.antispamsniper.com/forum > Stuart>> Are you using IMAP or POP3. > Stuart>> I am not seeing this at all, although mine is the paid version. As a Stuart>> matter of fact it is considerably better at filtering spam. I'm not Stuart>> sure what the differences are between the versions and it this would Stuart>> have an effect. You do have to make some changes in the Servers tab in Stuart>> order to get IMAP filtering working properly. > > > Thanks for the lead. I use pop3.
Thanks for your comments. I'm using an older free version (1.8.0.8) which works fine. If updating causes false detections and buying it causes "black holes" in the icon list, I guess I'll stick with what I've got. -- Best regards, Bill TB! Pro 3.99.8 AntispamSniper 1.8.0.8 XP Pro SP2 POP3 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.99.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
