In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : M>>> With all of this, my opinion is that the behaviour in 3.99.29 M>>> (and previous?) when using Ctrl+V on the name of a group was the M>>> buggy one, and that it is working correctly now. It's just my M>>> opinion.
>> I disagree! :) M> OK, I won't send you to jail for that :) Good! :) >> Ritlabs should work some way to have only ONE shortcut to move >> messages no matter if it was a single message, a subject group or a >> reference *thread*. M> Not easy. If you select a single message in a "proper thread", even M> if it is the first one, how can TB know if you want to move the M> whole thread or just the selected message? By asking with an M> options dialog? I don't know what's your definition of thread but lets assume that it a group of messages related by reference, subject, sender or any other in common characteristic. If you select the row that aggregates the thread it should interpret as a move thread. Anything else should be considered as a move message(s). M> But I am beginning to think you may be right in one way. In the M> case of "subject groups", if you select the "group name", then M> there is no doubt if what you want to do is move a single message M> (because the group title isn't a message) or the entire group. M> Similarly to what Windows does when in Explorer you select a file M> or a folder and use Ctrl+X->Ctrl+V. M> Anyway, and in case you don't know, dragging the 'group name' of a M> "subject group" to a different folder does still move the entire M> thread (group). Yes it does but it's not as simple as using the shortcut. I would have to open the folder tree prior to move the messages. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Don't you sometimes wish taht there was a solution to ever ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
