In reply to <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : GF>> I find interesting that HTML emails are forbidden but pointless u&r GF>> emails aren't...
RO> Some remarks: RO> U&R messages aren't pointless. Sometimes there are versions that don't RO> run for a minority (like OTFE users) without those U&R messages it RO> would appear that a version wouldn't run at all so others wouldn't try RO> to install it. (That's just one example) They are pointless to the point where people are merely stating that they've installed that particular version. Adding the fact that people insert their physical location and it's pretty obvious that they're not really giving beta test input. They find it amusing, so you have a thread with a couple o people testing bugfixes and a douzen saying that they've installed the version and it runs (what else could be expected from a beta version?) RO> HTML messages aren't forbidden. They're merely forbidden when the RO> format doesn't add something to the content. I can remember a rather Exactly my point regarding the U&R messages! RO> recent thread with lots HTML replies, discussing TB's HTML replies. RO> Entirely on topic. I have nothing against people saying that OTFE isn't running. RO> The preferred place for discussion about the list rules is private RO> mail to the moderation team. <g,d&r> RO> SCNR Sure. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Singers do it E V E R Y W H E R E ! ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 4.0.24.26 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
