Hi Michael, I am taking this off-group just to avoid becoming a distraction.
On 2/8/2009 11:43 AM, you wrote:
Hi Bob, it is a completely different story if we at least partially accept that TB's IMAP implementation is not perfect. And I can say that I'm using TB! for years anyway.
I understand that. I have been using TB for 3 1/2 years (having tried it some years earlier, before I had either Gmail or IMAP of any kind).
Nevertheless the stability of TB! IMAP connection and some other issues are being discussed for years now. In some versions it seems that Ritlabs made some progress and with the next version it is even worse.
That is what I understand, from being on the TB Beta list. Of all the Windows IMAP-capable clients, it seems as though the two best are (in this order): 1) Mulberry (which has an ugly and overly complex interface IMHO); and 2) Thunderbird (whose interface is better, but not as good as TB's). As I have mentioned, Opera Mail does very well with Gmail's IMAP, also, but its interface IMHO is not as good as even Thunderbird's.
All I'm saying is that we're waiting for years now and it's really time to improve ( not to say goodbye). Greetings
I understand that, so I am keeping TB on my system but seldom using it for my primary mail account (Gmail's IMAP option).
Thank you for writing, Bob Riley ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
