5/22/2009  1:54 PM

Hi Thomas,

On 5/22/2009 Thomas Fernandez wrote:

TF> Hello Jernej,

TF> On Fri, 22 May 2009 19:27:47 +0200 GMT (23/May/09, 0:27 +0700 GMT),
TF> Jernej Simončič wrote:

>>> If so, I must stop recommending TB!. It's just not acceptable.

JS>> This is antivirus' program - not TB's program. I'm a developer myself,
JS>> and I have to deal with this regularly - AV vendors will sometimes
JS>> indiscriminantely flag a whole class of programs as malware, and
JS>> there's little you can do about this, especially if you're not their
JS>> customer. Sadly, from my experience, no AV vendor is immune to this,
JS>> though some are worse than others.

TF> I understand what you say, but for the user, Thunderbird, Eudora or
TF> even Outlook don't have this problem that TB! has. I can explain a
TF> hundred times to him that it is not TB!'s fault, but he will still
TF> choose to use another email client.

Why don't you educate him on the quality of AV programs. Send him the
link to see the list. It may be an eye opener. Helping him to get away
from McAfee would be a blessing for him (and you?).
- --
Take Care,
Paul

Voyager v.4.0.34 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP  OTFE


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 4.1.14.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to