Hello Alto, Saturday, May 30, 2009, 3:32:39 PM, you wrote: > You said it better than I did. I agree: What we see as incompetence, > dishonesty and downright treason against long-time users may actually > be resignation by RIT knowing they are fighting a lost war.
Yeah. The only problem is that it has now become an excuse. Because *now* there are fewer people interested in IMAP than there might have been -- so no need to implement it anymore, right? So what once might have been a decision (or lack thereof), now has become an excuse. What's funny here, is that generally all excuses on IMAP are usually mentioned by, well, "passionate users" always advocating what Ritlabs is doing (or not doing which is, as we learn, also a good thing). Ritlabs do not really comment on that (apart from the traditional "IMAP will be improved in next version" but well, no one treats this seriously, including them, I guess). > I think I need to do another test series to see if Outlook really is > that bad in daily use. I am using it at work. I both have to and I think that there is no other option, really (I need the collaboration functionality). For private email, I don't think it would be suitable for me. -- Best regards, Robert Tomanek mailto:[email protected] ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 4.1.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
