> From: Jonathan McCune [mailto:jonmcc...@cmu.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 4:01 PM
> 
> Well, I tried lots of BIOS versions.  v1.24 gives me a Microcode Error
> 1801 (unrelated to TXT) and runs the fans at full speed, so I didn't
> get very far with it.  v1.26 hangs with the BIOS screen displayed
> after rebooting immediately upon executing SENTER (again sounds
> consistent with what Hal was reporting with his 'older' BIOS -- I'm
> guessing that was v1.26).  v1.28's behavior is indistinguishable from
> that of v1.27's, which was the version that has been on my machine for
> months or possibly years.
> 
> I tried disabling basically everything non-essential in BIOS (left
> enabled a single serial port, single SATA port, Ethernet, and video;
> disabled USB, firewire, parallel port, floppy, CD-ROM, audio, ...).
> No change.  Just toggles between the two TXT.ERRORCODES (0xC00020A1 or
> 0xC00018A1).
> 
> This really has me confused.  I've successfully used this machine for
> tboot/Flicker countless times in the past, and I really have no idea
> what would have changed that suddenly caused it to behave the way Hal
> previously described things.
> 
> Could adding or removing PCI cards make a difference?  It may have
> previously had two NICs, and now only has one (can't remember for
> sure).
> 
> It has 4GB of RAM, which I believe it has always had.  I can always
> try removing some...
> 
> Any ideas?

The possible culprits for a change in behavior could be:  "significant" memory 
change (e.g. <4GB to >4GB, PCI/PCIe devices added/removed, internal devices 
enabled/disabled (e.g. Azalia, ME).  You could also try resetting the BIOS to 
its defaults.

Joe

> 
> Thanks,
> -Jon
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Jonathan McCune <jonmcc...@cmu.edu> wrote:
> > Hi Hal, Martin, list,
> >
> > Any progress on this front?  I've just run into this same issue (error
> > codes 0xC00020A1 or 0xC00018A1 depending on whether USB/floppy/1394
> > are enabled -- suspect USB is what's meaningful but haven't dissected
> > it) on a dc7800 with tboot-20100427 (w/ Q35 SINIT modules v18, 17,and
> > 16) and tboot-20090330 (w/ Q35 SINIT module v16).  I hope to continue
> > experimenting with interesting combinations, but when I last used this
> > machine, I don't recall ever having this problem.
> >
> > My system has BIOS version 1.27 installed.  I can see that there's a
> > 1.28 available from HP's web page.  Hal, you said that reverting BIOS
> > versions helped you out.  Do you happen to know which version you
> > used?  If it's younger than 1.27, do you happen to have the installer
> > for it?
> >
> > I'll post a follow-up if I figure out anything interesting.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Jon
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Martin Thiim <mar...@thiim.net> wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Great. However, I'm still curious about what caused it to fail. I hope
> >> in the future more info will be released on what SINIT actually does.
> >>
> >> As my last posts indicated, it probably isn't/wasn't an inconsistency
> >> in the tables themselves, but rather an inconsistency with the tables
> >> and something outside the tables, such as either the PCI device BAR
> >> registers, or perhaps the register base of the DMA units that are off
> >> (i.e. maybe these registers don't actually point to a DMA unit).
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> Martin Thiim
> >>
> >> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Hal Finney<hal.fin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> As an update, I successfully rolled back my BIOS to an earlier
> >>> version. With this change, tboot works again! GETSEC[SENTER] executes
> >>> with no errors and I get into the secure state. So it is definitely
> >>> some problem relating to the new BIOS.
> >>>
> >>> Interestingly, I dumped the DMAR tables created by the working BIOS
> >>> and they are byte for byte identical to what they were with the
> >>> non-working BIOS. So clearly there is no point in going over those
> >>> tables with a fine tooth comb to figure out what SINIT doesn't like
> >>> about them. Something else must be different. I'd say the SINIT error
> >>> codes are not particularly informative about what is going wrong in
> >>> this case.
> >>>
> >>> I hope the SINIT team will still look into this. I can easily go back
> >>> to the newer BIOS in order to reproduce the failing state. The new
> >>> BIOS has the advantage that I can reboot after an SINIT failure and
> >>> read the errorcode register. With the old BIOS, attempts to reboot
> >>> hang in the BIOS and it's not possible to read the errorcodes, which
> >>> made debugging TXT almost impossible.
> >>>
> >>> So I can either use the new BIOS which would allow some debugging but
> >>> which unfortunately doesn't work with SINIT; or I can use the old BIOS
> >>> which works with SINIT but reveals nothing when there is a failure.
> >>> Neither is a great alternative.
> >>>
> >>> Hal Finney
> >>>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> >> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus 
> >> on
> >> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> >> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> tboot-devel mailing list
> >> tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tboot-devel
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> tboot-devel mailing list
> tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tboot-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
tboot-devel mailing list
tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tboot-devel

Reply via email to