On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 01:32:17PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 11.03.13 at 14:21, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com> > >>> wrote: > > Could the commit should also mention what version of the Xen hypervisor > > supports this new flag and takes action on it? > > Do you really think this is needed? I generally try to stay away > from doing such, since backports can easily invalidate such > statements.
Perhaps just mention the title of the patch in the Xen tree? > > > Besides that little nit-pick it looks OK to me. Are there any changes > > neccessary on the IA64 or ARM side for this? > > Xen on IA64 is dead, so I don't see any need for further action You are touching generic ACPI code. My question was in terms of the Linux ACPI IA64 code. > there. And I don't think ARM has any ACPI enablement so far (on > the Xen side at least). And also on the Linux side by just doing a quick grep. Surely that will change at some point. > > Jan > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > xen-de...@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev _______________________________________________ tboot-devel mailing list tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tboot-devel
