>>> On 11.03.13 at 14:53, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 01:32:17PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 11.03.13 at 14:21, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com> >> >>> wrote: >> > Could the commit should also mention what version of the Xen hypervisor >> > supports this new flag and takes action on it? >> >> Do you really think this is needed? I generally try to stay away >> from doing such, since backports can easily invalidate such >> statements. > > Perhaps just mention the title of the patch in the Xen tree?
Okay, will send you a v2 with the hypervisor size change referenced. Sigh. >> > Besides that little nit-pick it looks OK to me. Are there any changes >> > neccessary on the IA64 or ARM side for this? >> >> Xen on IA64 is dead, so I don't see any need for further action > > You are touching generic ACPI code. My question was in terms of > the Linux ACPI IA64 code. The changes there are completely benign to IA64. Jan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev _______________________________________________ tboot-devel mailing list tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tboot-devel
