Hello Luigi,
On Monday, June 24, 2002 you wrote:

> I made that question because I did not find a reference of the feature in the
> helpfile, non in the user interface.

OK,  the  documentation  is  the  other  case.  It's not updated often
enough.

> I _hate_ M$ that hides the feature of its programs in the Registry file and
> you have to browse the knowledge base to find them.

I  hate  that  too. But it's not done only by microsoft. It's a common
practice.  Look  at mozilla for example. Anyway -- I'm not saying that
RIT  should  do  such thing. Actually I'm saying quite the opposite --
that  some  functions  are  hidden  in  the  menu  tree,  making  them
troublesome to use.

> Mybe a restyling should be considered, but PLEASE non fancy buttons or other
> Disney-style interface.

Still context buttons and more customization would help.

> A better documentation is worth tons of fancy buttons.

I'm  not  sure  if  we  understand  each  other -- that do you mean by
"fancy"  buttons?  I  didn't  write  about how the buttons should look
like,  I  wrote  about  the  necessity  of  their  existence, of their
appearing   depending   on   the   context,   the  necessity  of  more
customization  of the interface, like to build the main program window
from  a  dock-able  windows,  so  that you can re-arrange them how you
like.

Regards,

-- 
 / Krzysztof Trybowski  pgp 0xF8C68208 /--/  To get my pgp key, put  /
/ www.thebat.i.krakow.pl  uin 4350719 /--/  "send_key" in subject.  /_

Using The Bat! 1.60q [reg] under Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195.


______________________________________________________
Archives   : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to