Hello,

There had been some questions already about using the same SMTP server
for different accounts. For some people, however, the situation is the
other way round. I would sometimes use different SMTP servers for the
same account. Same "From:", same "Reply-to:", same POP3 mailbox - and
two different SMTP servers used in different times.

One of the reason is the following. The ISP which I use allows sending
through their SMTP for those clients only who are connected to their
modem pool. (And yes, they are one of the biggest ISPs here, a good
one, and not the only one with such policy in place. And yes, I asked
them "Could you please just introduce a good system of SMTP
authentication, which would authenticate me from anywhere instead of
limiting my ability to use it when calling through my mobile". They
are reluctant to do this, just like many other ISPs here. And no,
setting up my own SMTP server locally is not an option at the moment
for reasons beyond my control. Just answering your questions in
advance :).)

Therefore, when I'm on the trip and connect through my mobile for
example, I use my mobile operator's SMTP server (they also act as an
ISP for their customers, and allow to use their SMTP to everybody who
connects to their access numbers from their mobile phones). To do
that, I have to change manually the setting in "Account properties ->
Transport -> SMTP server".

So, what I would think about is probably some sort of "%SMTP" macro. I
would then assign two hotkeys to "%SMTP=smtp.my-regular-isp.com" and
"%SMTP=smtp.my-mobile-provider.com", respectively, and invoke one of
those when creating a message.

I understand there is a workaround, which is rather inconvenient
however. That would be to create two accounts (with the respective
%ACCOUNT macros) which are exactly the same except for their SMTP
settings, - one for my-regular-isp, and the other for
my-mobile-provider, - and to filter all mail messages from those two
to common folders. It _is_ inconvenient however; suffice it to say it
would need duplicating the whole lot of filters set up in my Sorting
Office (which I have to change sometimes), and, more generally, simply
looks as a dirty hack rather than a good clean solution :).

I am interested in whether anybody else thinks of that as a useful
feature worth posting as a wish on bugtrack.

Regards,
Maksym.

-- 
Maksym Kozub, MK881-UANIC    mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


________________________________________________________

http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to