Hi
On Wednesday 16 April 2014 at 2:22:19 AM, in <mid:897822825.20140416112...@anson.net.au>, Robin Anson wrote: > How can that be? I don't know, but I have finally given > up on TB! for business use and am moving to Outlook > now. Wow, that's drastic. At work I am forced to use Outlook, but do not use HTML except on the very odd occasion that I need to add into the email _body_ something that cannot easily be shown in plaintext. The vast majority of the time, such content sits more happily in my mind as an attachment. I send and receive dozens of emails per day with (mainly) Word, Excel, and PDF attachments. I only send an HTML email a small handful of times per year, and typically only receive one or two per month that cannot be usefully viewed in plaintext Many of my colleagues use HTML for all emails, pointlessly as the only thing they could not have done in plaintext is a fancy or coloured font in their signature block. (-; -- Best regards MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net I'll tell you what's the matter! This parrot is dead! Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 ________________________________________________ Current version is 6.1.8 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
