At 3:13:50 AM on Monday, October 11, 1999, your quill inscribed unto the ether:
S>> I tend to send and receive large attachments. Often I'll be sending
S>> an attachment from work to home, or vice versa. By 'large' I mean 4
S>> meg, 8 meg and 24 meg attachments.
> Why don't you use ftp for that? Do you know that when you send files
> by mail they get coded and grows in size about 30 per cent, and when
> you sending 24 meg file it means that you send about 32 meg
> attachment? There are also lots of free services offering a storage
> space by http.
I'm fully aware of the effects of base64 encoding on file sizes, and
of alternative transfer methods. In this case, email was the most
efficient method to get the file where I wanted it. Regardless, The
issue isn't whether or not I'm doing the Wrong thing, but the fact
that TB! seems to be trying to store the attachement completely in
memory in order to show the little icon that says "hey, there's an
attachment here." Again I ask: Has anybody else been noticing TB!
choking and dying on big attachments?
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
