Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Monday, October 11, 1999, Soth wrote about
A couple of gotchas.:
S> I'm fully aware of the effects of base64 encoding on file sizes, and
S> of alternative transfer methods. In this case, email was the most
S> efficient method to get the file where I wanted it. Regardless, The
S> issue isn't whether or not I'm doing the Wrong thing, but the fact
S> that TB! seems to be trying to store the attachement completely in
S> memory in order to show the little icon that says "hey, there's an
S> attachment here." Again I ask: Has anybody else been noticing TB!
S> choking and dying on big attachments?
Not me, because I don't ever send big attachments and always tell my
correspondents not to send me big attachments, and delete messages
with big attachments sent to me on server.
--
Best regards,
Oleg Zalyalov. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! version 1.36
under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 5, RC 1.1
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, click below and send the generated message.
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
