> Tuesday, November 09, 1999, 8:39:19 AM, Roel wrote:
>> don't know about that: if you look at the times the mails were
>> created: he generated about 3/minute...
>> if it had been a filter they would all have had the same
>> creation-time... (unless he's running a 286 at 6 Mhz :-) )
> If you look at the text, it was identical. I doubt that he was typing in
> identical text at 3/minute.
> Now, say he has a few hundred messages in his account on his ISP and he is
> downloading it. Those messages have TB! messages interspersed between them.
> That along with an errant filter would certainly fit the bill.
*grin* Without input Al himself, this is mostly academic. But, knowing
that...
A filter gone awry sounds plausible... but what I can't fit in is that
'canned text'. Is there a way to build a filter so that you type in the
reply to one email, and then have the client take that reply and
automatically apply it to all subsequent emails from that sender? I
mean without having the user input special canned text...
It couldn't be something that just re-copies your email to the out-box
-- that wouldn't change the subject line. We would also have to assume
that Al got his replies back before having sent out his own last
reply (just by the timing of everything)... but, for simplicity's sake,
we'll assume that he killed his client some time before it started
replying to his own replies...
So... any ideas?
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
