Hi Peter,
MDP>> It's good but comes with its' own problems. Every reference to such a
MDP>> %QINCLUDE macro in a template has the added burden of a forced CR/LF
MDP>> in the text wherever one is used. I have noticed this with %INCLUDE
MDP>> macros recently too. They didn't used to do that.
MDP>> Is this, in fact, a bug?
PH> The same is true for %CLEAR which should not insert a cr/lf pair in
PH> the message, IMO.
It does not include one, it simply leaves the one you typed
after it as is.
Maybe the wish could be "if a macro is immediately followed
by cr/lf, TB should delete this cr/lf pair."
But I guess this will result in problems in other cases.
Regards,
Wolfgang
Co-moderator TBUDL / TBBETA discussion lists
Using The Bat! 1.38e under Windows 95 4.0 Build 1111 B
in Darmstadt, Germany,
on a 166Mhz Cyrix, 128MB SDRAM, half SCSI system ;-)
http://people.frankfurt.netsurf.de/wky/
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
