Hi there!
On 12 Jan 00, at 0:24, Januk Aggarwal wrote
about "Re: Move old messages (was:Re: Inte":
> > This would mean to add another functionality to filters (date check -
> > costs processing time). It would be much easier to just add "move to"
> > as an option what to do with old messages (in additon to delete), as
> > suggested by Allie.
>
> > I would prefer that, as I see it as "archiving", not "filtering". The
> > message is old, you want to delete it or archive it.
>
> Why would you REQUEST something that limiting? If they offered
> filtering by date as well, you can achieve everything you and Allie
> have suggested _very_ easily. I can see having the date feature in
> the filters as being very useful.
Januk, let me put my name under this message of yours;-) Pleeaase! Just
wanted to write my own with something similar;-)
--
SY, Alex
(St.Petersburg, Russia)
http://mph.phys.spbu.ru/~akiselev
---
Thought for the day:
One man's Windows are another man's walls.
---
PGP public keys on keyservers:
0xA2194BF9 (RSA); 0x214135A2 (DH/DSS)
fingerprints:
F222 4AEF EC9F 5FA6 7515 910A 2429 9CB1 (RSA)
A677 81C9 48CF 16D1 B589 9D33 E7D5 675F 2141 35A2 (DH/DSS)
---
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
