Re[2]: How to catch all messages in a filter - was - Re: Move old messages

[Alex Sanyukovitch]

Hello Steve,

Thursday, January 13, 2000, 6:18:23 PM, you wrote:


SL>     Acrually e is better.  @ relies on the presence of an email address which
SL> may not always be the case.  However, all messages will have some common
SL> headers in them.  One of them is a Received header from each SMTP server.
SL>                                     ^ ^  ^
Not  really.  I  do  remove  all  "Received:"  fields (and others like
"X-List-Command:", "X-MSMail-Priority:", "X-Resent-To:", etc.) from my
mail,  because  it  takes  too much space (sometimes more that half of
message). So it will not work.

SL>     Since the received header is always going to be there, e is always going
SL> to be there.  ;)

So  header  will  not give us letter 'e' and body can be empty (try to
imagine mail with attachment only).

But  filtering  by string, which for sure will *never* present in mail
should work.

Never is a nice word, isn't it? ;-)

-- 
Best regards,
Alex Sanyukovitch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
19:23 13.01.2000

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------