Thursday, January 13, 2000
And, after that, support for ActiveX? And frames? And CSS? And, java
and javascript?
Where should it all stop?
My vote is that it not get going. Not at all. Not only, as Steve
comments, does it introduce security concerns, but with each added
"feature," the code becomes larger and larger; and, in case you hadn't
noticed, larger is unstabler. Also, larger tends to become beyond
troublestooting.
NO HTML "features"!!!!!!!!!
Best regards,
Curt
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 12:16:23 -0500, Sashka wrote:
Sashka> Hello ,
LG>>> and viewing href'd images?
>> This will be possible when we will write our own Web browser - I
>> guess, this is a topic for another interview, but you should wait for
>> it for several months :-)
Sashka> just wondering, how long time will take for us, to make RitLabs add
Sashka> support for "img src" from external website in html messages. With
Sashka> Serial number in headers it took somewhere one week for them, to
Sashka> remove it. Let ask all of us to add this feature also. I'm sure, if
Sashka> everyone from us will ask them to do this, they will. and won't tell
Sashka> that they not going to write own web browser ;-)
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
