Friday, January 14, 2000, 4:24:41 PM, Allie wrote:
> Can't sentence the user to a perennial popup confirmation to deal with
> possible exceptions to an overwhelming rule. Isn't that taking your never
> assume philosophy a bit too far ..... to the point where you're shooting
> yourself in the foot? :)
Nope. There is a choice there that has to be made, why should the
computer assume which address to send to?
> BTW, Nick did bring up a valid point about simply looking at the To:
> address before hitting send. I see that in a similar way as checking to
> make sure there's a subject before sending. TB! is a little unorthodox in
> that it will put the senders name and the reply to address together in the
> To: field. If that confuses the user then the user may turn it off.
I'd love to know how. I don't see a checkbox for it. Wait, I bet it is
another #$^#$^$#%ing macro. Nope, a freaking checkbox this time. I wish
RITLABS would stop dicking around and do the configuration right. Jeez.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
