Hi Syafril,
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:21:24 +0700GMT (28/01/2000, 09:21 +0800GMT),
Syafril Hermansyah wrote:
t>> Thai works... Even in Notepad, Wordpad.
Tracer, isn't your Windows Thai? <g> Seriously, the way I understand
you (and Unicode) is that "all" languages are there in W2K. Wouldn't
that be a huge overhead?
SH> Just a note, Chinese (or Japanese) character only seen better in
SH> replying editor, means if I receive Chinese character it looks like
SH> garbage character till I reply...seems like TB! auto encode can't
SH> recognize well the character set in "receive mode" :-(
Cannot confirm this under C-Win98, Syafril; Chinese displays correctly
in both cases. Of course, it's the only thing displaying correctly
(namely Big5 encoding) ;-). I do not understand why there would be a
difference in your case. Are you using different Translation
(right-click when viewing) or Encoding (Options/Message Encoding in
Editor when forwarding)? If both is the same chosen language, you
should see the same on your screen IMHO.
I wish I could use characters now only in ISO-8859-2 or Thai (CU). If
W2K has all these languages, you don't need TB's Encoding/Translation
function at all, do you? Or do you still need it, with an additional
choice UTF-8? And if you have it, how does this depend on W2K?
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.39
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
