On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 00:41:05 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
> P.S. For all of you struggling with the sig delimiters, proper & improper ones:
> why the hell not write a *simple* regexp instead of relying on TB's built-in sig-
> stripping capabilities? This way one can catch not only the "proper" delimiter:
>-\s--\s\n)?
> Just a question:-) Anybody needs the working regexp? I'm starting the votes
> collection;-)
I don't want to take away Alexanders pleasure making up a *simple*
Regexp, (i know that he can do very complicated ones) but i posted
one that does a similar job some weeks ago in tbbeta. I have used it
since then and it seems to work quite well. Additionally to the
feature list above it does
(iii) strip the PGP signature (which makes the Regexp not that
simple anymore)
but it does not (i) But this is easy to fix. Just insert |--\n at
the right position ;-))
To not interfere with the vote taking, i don't repost the Regexp
now (anybody can look it up in the tbbeta archive, look for "REGEXP
example"), and i don't tell the exact position of the fix just
now ;-))
Regards
Peter
--
Peter Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP-ID 0x02850F53 (DH/DSS)
PGP Fingerprint 68AB D08E D995 41B4 C6FD 639D 9B94 D249 0285 0F53
"U dene n ischs i d Chn�de gl��tet wie bsch�ttigs
Chr�zim��l d�re Ch�tschabertrog." - Franz Hohler
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
