Hello John De Hoog,
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000 09:22:22 +0900 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, February 14, 2000, 7:22:22 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
John De Hoog wrote:
> Hello, tracer,
> On Monday, February 14, 2000, you wrote:
t>> But if you mail houskeeping works properly and if as I do myself mail
t>> is stored in received order per folder, the whole problem is les
t>> important as where I was and/or want to be very likely is in either
t>> the last read msg or the one above and to me that difference/one
t>> keystroke is ignorable...
> But that's only one way of ordering mail. In a mailing list like
> this, suppose you opt for a threaded view, and messages arrive for
> different threads. They will be scattered through the message list.
> The only way to get to each one is to open the folder, open the
> threads, and find each unread article manually or with that awkward
> CTRL + ]. This is not a good interface if you like to thread
> discussions.
Ok, agreed, but I rarely thread mail as anything I read which I am
following I remember anyway. Normally not all the details though...
Threading I use if I want to find a specific message in a thread.
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.41 Beta/3 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]