On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 08:53:17 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
SL>>> Compared to telnetting to the POP port all mail clients are
SL>>> automated.
>> so whats the point? ah, you just wanted to answer him. ok...
> No, the point is that every other client is automated as well. I'm sorry,
> but Netscape is automated, PMMail is automated, Eudora Pro is automated,
> Pegasus is automated, Lookout! is even automated. It isn't that special. In
> fact, TB!'s "automation" pales compared to mutt's. :P
Aaah, Good Lord Steve. Read what I wrote. It's a statement of comparison
that does NOT imply that other e-mail clients aren't automated as well.
"TB! *does* offer a level of automating functionality that far exceeds
that of any other client that I know of."
The level of macro and template functionality at the folder and address
book level. Folder specific settings where purging is concerned. The
filtering capabilities are what I'm talking about. Yes, other mailers that
I have used offer these but not in such a wholesome, thorough package.
But you have to have the last word. Ok, Mutt makes TB! pale in comparison
where automation is concerned. Hurah! Wonderful. :-)
--
� 2000 Allie Martin
Using TB! v1.42 Beta/19 on Win2k Pro
---
** Never mind the facts - I know what I know.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
