On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 11:37:19 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> But you have to have the last word. Ok, Mutt makes TB! pale in
>> comparison where automation is concerned. Hurah! Wonderful. :-)
> Point was also to highlight the one part that people /WILL/ use on a
> consistent basis. TB! is one of only two email clients that handles multiple
> accounts in a sane manner. Even a power user like me pushing close to 1k
> messages a day through TB! only has two dozen filters, a whole *2* folders
> with automated deletion and maybe 1 alternative template which is needed. I
> have 2 others which are fluff and nothing more. I find them useful, yes, but
> I could switch back to PMMail tomorrow if they released a version with IMAP
> and not miss them. OTOH, IMAP in a package that doesn't handle multiple
> accounts properly is useless to me.
> I don't get the notion that the cutsey fluff features mean poo in a one
> line summery. If they did you'd all lose anyway because we can't skin TB!.
Hmmm. That's a sort of egocentric position to take. If the features aren't
useful to *you*, then they're 'cutsey fluff'. Lovely. :-)
ROTFL!!!
--
� 2000 Allie Martin
Using TB! v1.42 Beta/19 on Win2k Pro
---
** Funny off-topic messages are always on-topic.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
