Hello Steve and other fellow TB! users,
Saturday, May 06, 2000, 2:07:08 PM, you wrote:
SL> This was a problem? I parked them so they don't get nixed and so
SL> they would be different than the rest.
Right. I also made separate folders for flagged and unflagged
messages. I could select say all of April's TBUDL and set it aside
in an unflagged April 2000 TBUDL subdirectory so the inbox would
open faster, refusing to include the parked messages - things I was
more likely to want to refer to later, and put them in a single
parked TBUDL folder.
>> I hope the color coding uses a five (rather than three) level
>> scheme, in order to more fully differentiate those messages
>> requiring or deserving follow up.
SL> That is my point. With colors we can now, ahem, flag something
SL> as important without the flag command.
True. Colors differentiate it - more than a flag can. Some mailers
use flags of distinct colors, however - but TB! provides unlimited
colors on the header itself, fast (rightclick + G twice gives me a
grey message - but I think I'll change it to green).
SL> It was, and is, completely useless.
The flags are pretty and don't really bloat TB! - and the column can
be hidden. Although I agree, the colors do more and would have
sufficed.
DH
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
