On Sat, 20 May 2000 16:50:19 -0700, Ming-Li wrote:
>> I am one who likes it that way. Let's face it, it's auto-retrieval and
>> the associated executions that allowed such exploits as the Love Bug.
>> Okay, a graphic isn't going to do damage, but that's not the point.
>> Mail should be self contained - attachments are part of that. When a
>> graphic is correctly attached to HTML email, it is shown in-line.
> I'm also a new trial user, and I'm not sure I get you. On my system
> (I'm also using TB 1.42f on Windows 98), even attached graphic is not
> shown in-line. Am I missing anything?
Well, send a sample of such a message to Ritlabs and discuss it
with them. If the graphic is //correctly// attached to the HTML e-mail
then it's shown in-line. On the few occasions I've received such a beast,
it has displayed OK.
--
Allie Martin [ TB! v1.42f | Win2k Pro ]
PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=GetAlliePGPKey
- Tag: "Oxymoron: Smart Bomb. "
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
