Hello Rich,
On Fri, 2 Jun 2000 10:49:53 -0400 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, June 02, 2000, 9:49:53 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Rich wrote:
> Hey, Lloyd,
> Friday, June 02, 2000, 10:37:51 AM, you wrote:
LL>> When will TB actually function properly in Win2000? The
LL>> website information is SILENT on this ... Win98 performance
LL>> is excellent (v 1.44).
> I've been using thebat on Windows 2000 for almost a year now and
> have not had any problems. I've used it under a reagular modem
> dial-in, and finally, I just got DSL last week and it still works
> properly.
what motherboard /chipset...
windows 2000 has many bugs and problems and while on my intel based
chipsets it r an ok, nothing but problems on the very recent Via and
Ali chipsets. Makes one wonder if thats an accident (g).
And as latest Intel chipsets have their own bugs...
I had 2000 installed twice and 2000 worked lousy but the Bat worked.
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.44 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
