Hi dynamite,
> Point taken - however, having worked on usability studies in the
> past - having to "program" an application to deal with exceptions
> like that is the sort of thing mainstream users HATE in programs.
> So if TB! has ambitions to enter the mainstream, maybe a
> configuration option to "ignore" blank header fields would be a
> reasonable compromise?
Agreed. But I would suggest: if TB wants to "fill in the blank" in
such cases, don't use TB's received date, which is the date TB
collect mail. Instead, use the earliest "Received" field in the
header (the bottom most one), which is the closest to the original
created date.
--
Best regards,
Ming-Li
Using The Bat! 1.45 S/MIME under Win2k
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
