Monday, August 28, 2000, 12:54:10 PM, you wrote:
>>> For a simple OR function, would we have:
>>> '[str A]|[str B]'
I've backed off from using the | for now, and have a more basic
question.
Let me give a specific example. I have a rule that has two strings in
two sets in the Alternatives section. The exact strings, copied from
TB are:
[X-SBClass: Blocked]
[X-SBClass: Spam]
A message with either of these is sent to the 'spam' folder. That
works.
BUT, a message with the header
X-SBClass: Admin
is *also* sent to spam. Neither of the 'spam' strings is in the message
at all. Why is this happening?
I first had the strings in there without the [] brackets - is still
sends it to the wrong place. Should this (in theory) make a
difference?
Theory 1: it is just comparing the string up to the first space, and
ignoring the rest. If so, what special characters can I use to get TB
to compare the whole string, including the embedded spaces?
Theory 2: one needs to check the 'regular expressions' box in options
to get this to work. Is this true?
JA>> As far as I know, no. In a *single* string set, you could only do the
JA>> C and D and (E or F). See my example in a previous post to this
JA>> thread.
MDP> Absolutely. ZTrader - Januk's example was *crystal* clear on this
MDP> point.
I think I understand that, but this is subject to change with the
next thing that does not work as I thought it would :-).
Thanks much,
ztrader mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
