Hello ztrader,

as soon as I have something worth protecting other than my trivial
mail I will also want security over convenience. What I won't have is
security  forced on me. I mean, I have for instance disabled MS
Scripting Host, so I do not necessarily need The Bat! to be "my Dad"
and warn me against opening attachments. It is a waste of time.

Security is good, but should be optional...mostly! :)

Monday, August 28, 2000, 6:46:38 PM, you wrote:

z> A major reason I got TB was to avoid security problems with Micro$oft.
z> It make me nervous to see so much cheeering for adding features that
z> require tight 'integration' in Windows. This could open up holes, and
z> I would hope that there is very careful consideration given to the
z> security aspect of added features. I'd love all the conveniences that
z> can be added *without compromising security*.

z> I, for one, value security over convenience. I hope I'm not the only
z> one...
  
z>  ztrader                          mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
Best regards,
Christian Dysthe                           
http://christian.dysthe.tripod.com
ICQ: 3945810

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------

You are subscribed as : [email protected]


Reply via email to