Hello Warren,
Saturday, September 02, 2000, 10:23:05 PM, you wrote:
W> Does it, really? I tested it by sending myself copies of the "love
W> letter" and "very funny" viruses from another machine as binary
W> attachments. NAV2K did, indeed, scan the incoming emails, but it did
W> not alert me to their contents until I attempted to save the
W> attachments. Only when I sent them as text attachments or in the body
W> of the email did NAV2K detect them and, no matter which option I chose
W> (repair attachment, delete, quarantine), The Bat's "retrieving mail
W> from server" pop-up box would stay open and The Bat would hang. I
W> could close the box, but The Bat would still hang. I'd have to close
W> the program, turn off email scanning, and restart.
Well NAV is known as very stupid anti-virus program which has very low
possibilities for finding new (cloned) viruses. It's heruistic methods
are bad. Same performace is with McAfee. Again I suggest AVP!
--
Best regards,
Vladimir mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
