Hello tracer,
Sunday, September 03, 2000, 3:23:04 AM, you wrote:
t> Hello Vladimir Mincev,
t> On Sun, 3 Sep 2000 00:33:23 +0200 GMT your local time,
t> which was Sunday, September 03, 2000, 5:33:23 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
t> Vladimir Mincev wrote:
>> Well NAV is known as very stupid anti-virus program which has very
>> low possibilities for finding new (cloned) viruses. It's heruistic
>> methods are bad. Same performace is with McAfee. Again I suggest
>> AVP!
t> same performance isnt surprising since Mcafee nicked part of the
t> Symantec code before they bought Dr Solomons.... and the Av part
t> wasnt the only sw Symantec found pieces of their code.
Good to know how it was done! I hate monopolizing of big companies
such as MicroSoft, Symantec... For example I *hate* that AtGuard was
bought by Symantec. AtGuard was freeware, and now you must buy it as
Norton Internet Security 2000 (NAV is implemented in it!). One more
thing, it's size was 1.5 Mb, and now it is 43 Mb (NAV is 27 Mb +
AtGurd is 1.5 Mb =lets say even 30 Mb, question: What happened with 13
Mb? Gone on make-up?). That is all for now... This is not one of the
topics of this mailing list so I apologize to list moderators!
--
Best regards,
Vladimir mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
