Hello Oliver Sturm,

Responding  to  your  article on Tuesday, September 19, 2000 at 09:32:10
GMT +0200 (which was 19/09/2000 14:32 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :

>> But  starting from 1.45/SMIME this problem has been fixed (I didn't
>> test 1.45 without S/MIME).

>> Suggestion, try to use 1.45/SMIME, see the result.

OS> It's considered beta, isn't it?

Yes it is.

OS> I  usually  have  nothing  against beta testing, but not on my 200MB
OS> mail  base,  sorry...  I've  submitted it as a bug report and as the
OS> issue  is  rather clear to see once you find the RFC, I hope it will
OS> be fixed in the next version.

I am supporting you, but I didn't see the copy on TBUDL list (?)

-- 
Best regards,

- Syafril -

************************************************************************
Name  : Syafril Hermansyah          |Company: Duta Integrasi Pratama 
Mailto: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>     |Voice  : (62) (21) 385-1600  
FAXto : (62)(21)351-9241 key:000FAX |URL    : <http://www.dutaint.co.id>
************************************************************************

Using The Bat! 1.47 Beta/3
under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1

Created : Tuesday, September 19, 2000, 16:07:13 GMT +0700

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------

You are subscribed as : [email protected]


Reply via email to