Hello Oliver Sturm,
Responding to your article on Tuesday, September 19, 2000 at 09:32:10
GMT +0200 (which was 19/09/2000 14:32 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
>> But starting from 1.45/SMIME this problem has been fixed (I didn't
>> test 1.45 without S/MIME).
>> Suggestion, try to use 1.45/SMIME, see the result.
OS> It's considered beta, isn't it?
Yes it is.
OS> I usually have nothing against beta testing, but not on my 200MB
OS> mail base, sorry... I've submitted it as a bug report and as the
OS> issue is rather clear to see once you find the RFC, I hope it will
OS> be fixed in the next version.
I am supporting you, but I didn't see the copy on TBUDL list (?)
--
Best regards,
- Syafril -
************************************************************************
Name : Syafril Hermansyah |Company: Duta Integrasi Pratama
Mailto: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |Voice : (62) (21) 385-1600
FAXto : (62)(21)351-9241 key:000FAX |URL : <http://www.dutaint.co.id>
************************************************************************
Using The Bat! 1.47 Beta/3
under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1
Created : Tuesday, September 19, 2000, 16:07:13 GMT +0700
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]