-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Graham,

On 22 September 2000 at 19:19:26 GMT +0100 (which was 19:19 where I
live) Graham wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Fixed or variable width? (was Re[2]: Karin and The Bat)":

G> As  a  responsible adult, I WANT to use proportional fonts. The Bat
G> is acting like "uncle" and preventing ME from doing so.

And  how  do  you re-write all of TB paragraph handling and formatting
routines  which  absolutely *rely* on the font being fixed width? It's
not  an  "uncle"  thing. It's the result of an implementation decision
taken three years ago which RIT labs are very much tied in to.

There is a clear requirement for choice but *not* in V1. It breaks too
many  things that are absolutely *right* about the way V1 works within
itself.

You  are  at liberty to break the way V1 works (the freedom you crave)
with  the  now  infamous  registry hack that lets you use proportional
fonts.  You  did  know  about  that, didn't you? Maybe not. Here it is
again:

(posted previously by Alexander V. Kisilev)

    For if you _absolutely_ need variable- width font ..., you
    can go and manually edit your registry, in particular, these
    sections of it:

    HKEY_USERS\.Default\Software\RIT\The Bat!\Editor\Font
    HKEY_USERS\.Default\Software\RIT\The Bat!\Rich Text

    If you manually edit there the name of the font to be used,
    The Bat! will obey... But be advised, that if, for example,
    you write there "Arial", you'll hardly manage to read
    anything:-)

G> It would not be so bad if most of the other software out there
G> acted like The Bat, but they don't. The Bat is non-standard in its
G> approach,

Being  "different"  is  no  sin. We all agree that proportionality has
its'  place.  That  spot  is not available in V1. The programmers have
seen  this  gripe  from,  oh,  I'd guess at around 99.95% of *all* new
users. Seriously! *Everyone* says it. That's why the arguments against
it get so terse. Everyone's coming back with the reasons they have had
to  adopt  for  /accepting/  it the way it is in the hope that you can
draw some comfort from one or other of them.

G> is irksome to me, and I'd like the choice.

What  can  I  say? You've made your choice. You're using Becky <g>. To
use  TB  you  would  have to either hack the registry or live with the
mono fonts and wait for V2.

- --
Cheers,
.\\arck
 ________________________________________________________________
[    Marck D. Pearlstone | Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA              ]
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com      ]
[ PGP Key: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=GET%20MARCKKEY> ]

 A mouse is just an elephant built by the Japanese
 ________________________________________________________________
 TB! v1.46d S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222  A

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness!

iQA/AwUBOcurpjnkJKuSnc2gEQJQ2QCg5xfA3ljW0vnmYQuuVFcgp1YzoZ0AoMAd
ukZ5LIlZx596Gu/4TBs0TOOx
=2eAr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org


Reply via email to