Hello Ming-Li,
On Montag, 25. September 2000 at 20:25:34 you wrote:
> Ah-so, that make sense, don't you think?
In one way it does, but since all three methods of confirmation are
invoked by TB! itself and not from the user _I_ don't see why they
should be treated differently. Moreover it should be no problem to
omit the replied flagging when using the "edit" method. I do not see
the difference between opening and editing the confirmation message
and then putting it into outbox (edit) or putting it into outbox ,
then opening and editing it and finally putting it back into outbox
(Put in outbox). The former method is the faster one, though, but
right now the latter method is the better implemented one.
so long
Tobias
--
Tobias Wrede
Using The Bat! 1.46c on Windows NT 4.0 Service Pack 6
Anything that happens, happens. - Anything that, in happening, causes
something else to happen, causes something else to happen. - Anything
that, in happening, causes itself to happen again, happens again. - It
doesn't necessarily do it in chronological order, though.
(from Douglas Adams: Mostly Harmless)
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
