I respectfully disagree. The situation you describe is a very minor
inconvenience (one key stroke). You have made the assumption that the
responder wishes to comment on EVERY paragraph of the included
text. A majority of the time, that is not the case.
Personally, I find it difficult to follow "who said what" with your
implementation of the %quotes macro. I STRONGLY prefer every line,
including blank lines to include the quote mark. Can this be an
optional setting in the next version?
Regards,
William L. Grant
Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
> I guess, I should explain why. Blank lines are used for separating
> paragraphs, right? So, if you want to insert your comments between
> quoted paragraphs, you should place the cursor on the first blank line
> and start typing. Now, if the blank line is quoted, you should either
> remove quoting at the start of the line or press the Enter key, but
> you will end up with a new quoted line and you still have to remove
> quoting. :-) Both ways are not very comfortable, are they? That is why
> we decided not to quote blank lines. And, from my point of view,
> absence of quote marks at the start of blank lines makes quoted text
> more readable...
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
