Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Monday, October 30, 2000, 14:49:29, you wrote,
M> Hi Kevin,
K>> I may be mistaken but isn't it still possible for them to harvest
K>> e-mail addresses that have obvious anti-spam additions to the
K>> e-mail address?
M> Although it is possible, I don't think that they bother. Taking a
M> freely published address is "fair game". Manipulating a masked address
M> of an individual who is clearly asking not to be bothered is an
M> absolute infringement of that individual's rights.
As I'm sure you've noticed I don't 'munge' my e-mail address at all,
surprisingly I receive very little spam, at least compared with
others, guess I'm just lucky, now I've said that I'll probably be
deluged with the stuff.
M> Believe it or not, spammers actually believe they provide a
M> legitimate and necessary service!
Oh, I believe it. It's the best way for them to justify wasting
everyone elses time and in some cases money.
--
Kevin
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
