On Thursday, November 09, 2000, 10:25:07 AM, Marck wrote:
>>> That would be really good. So a PGP signed message would look
>>> very similar to an S/MIME one once in the message base.
ML>> Sorry, I don't understand this. How does a S/MIME message look
ML>> in a message base? You mean with their signature data removed?
> It looks as it did when it arrived - with a MIME attachment which
> contains the signature. This is a clear construct which remains
> intact in the message base (that's why I keep bringing it up).
Ah-so, so it DOES look the same as a PGP-signed message, doesn't it?
I thought, according to your previous message, they look differently
in the message base in TB's current implementation.
ML>> I was merely suggesting TB to recognize the right signature
ML>> line in a PGP-signed message and strip the extra PGP kludges
ML>> automatically as many do now with those spectacular macros
ML>> (thanks to you and other RE experts on the list) WHEN creating
ML>> a reply. Nothing in the message base need to be changed.
> I was suggesting that it would be nice to see the message as written
> with the signature showing up as an external phenomenon.
That would be good, too, though it isn't what I had in mind. :)
> Yes, it probably would be nice if Reply did do it all by itself but,
> hey, we're there already with the RE ;-).
RE-savvy users are there already. Some people on the list or who
have seen the instruction in the FAQ might follow suit. Others,
however, have trouble dealing with it.
--
Best regards,
Ming-Li
The Bat! 1.48 Beta/4 | Win2k SP1
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
