-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At 04:13 PM 06/01/01, Charlie (ceejay) wrote:
>Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed that the wait after initial
>selection of spell checking is becoming longer with each new version.
>I can almost brew up while v1.49 chugs along in it's attempt to bring
>the spell checker to life!
If I'm not mistaken, TB!'s spell checker has 3 settings, with the 3rd being
the most comprehensive, but also taking the longest time. Perhaps you have
inadvertently chosen door #3. ;o)
>Another small point, this concerns the red underlining of unrecognised
>words while editing. Even after selecting 'ignore all' the checker
>merrily continues to underline the word when encountered later on in
>the same message. TB! appears to have a mind of its own when it comes
>to determining which words it wants to ignore.
Yes, that behaviour has been around for a long long time, and remains an
unresolved issue with TB!'s spell checker.
Nick
N.J. Andriash [Eudora 5.0.2 | PGP 7.0.1 | Win 98 SE]
Vancouver, B.C. Canada | PGP Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE
____________________________________________________
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.1
Comment: Join PGP-Basics at http://www.egroups.com/group/PGP-Basics
iQA/AwUBOlfFScUChHR7o/3OEQJP/gCfWPInDv6RTruGHy69QU3f+kMUDV0An0up
ZbFVWvmfegtny8YtAw7AtiCK
=jLwg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
