Hi Fred,
On Sun, 07 Jan 2001, at 03:19:39 [GMT +0000] you wrote:
NA>>> If I'm not mistaken, TB!'s spell checker has 3 settings, with the 3rd being
NA>>> the most comprehensive, but also taking the longest time. Perhaps you have
NA>>> inadvertently chosen door #3. ;o)
>> I have it set at: Moderately fast and accurate. I go along with
>> accurate description, but moderately fast is being generous to say the
>> least. The problem is far more pronounced at the initial firing up of
>> the checker, and generally improves as editing goes on.
FW> I have noticed an extreme slowdown a few versions ago, but I switched from
FW> "moderately fast and accurate" to "fast but less accurate" and immediately
FW> saw a speed up. But my initial symptoms were the same: -very- slow at the
FW> initial firing up of the spell checker the -first- time in each new
FW> message/reply. "Fast but less accurate" has made the problem less
FW> pronounced.
Yes that does make a considerable difference for me too. I have to
admit that spelling is a weak point for me, which accounts for my
reliance on the 'accurate' option. Which highlights my own
shortcomings, not TB!
--
ceejay
Wales (UK)
PGP key ID:0xFCCC248C
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
