-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On February 13, 2001, at 2:28:55 AM, Dierk Haasis Wrote:
DH> BTW, how come PGP gives out the correct holder of the signature but
DH> says "bad". A tampered signature shouldn't be verifiable at all?!
Well, technically the signature hasn't been tampered with. Rather, the
message content has changed between the clear-text, and what PGP sees when
the Message Digest has been re-computed using PGPTray. That is the reason
for the "Bad" signature.
Nick
N.J. Andriash [ TB! v1.49c | PGP 7.0.3 | Win 98 SE ]
Vancouver, B.C. Canada | PGP Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE
_____________________________________________________
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.3
Comment: Join PGP-Basics: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
iQA/AwUBOolOLsUChHR7o/3OEQLJvwCcCgxOgEM3w8nYjJ1FwdBh969xuFEAoPPT
gXDS2pkUiZgXR5dK0JqSPhZP
=Yupt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
