Hi Käö§,

On 13 March 2001 at  03:34:48 +1000 (which was 17:34 where I  live)
Käö§ wrote to Marck D. Pearlstone and made these points:

K> Well Marck I knew this would happen, and although the basic problem
K> has not been solved, some basic education certainly has, and I
K> thank you.

My pleasure - anything to help :-).

<snip>

K>>>> send, try switching ports from 25 to 26 for the SMTP server. This
K>>>> is because they block port 25 for third party servers.

MDP>> (Interesting!).

K> Which? Switching from Port 25 to 26 or the blocking of third
K> parties? And if you don't mind me asking why? (Now that you have me
K> interested).

Just that they offer SMTP support on port 26 as well as on port 25. To
me that seems unusual. It might not be. I run my own SMTP *and* POP3
server in-house - despite the dial-up status. I can achieve this
because I do have un-metered access and can stomach the retries. I
like to run my own servers because I like to know the fate of my
outbound messages and I do have my own domain to take care of.

MDP>> Okay - there's a terminological mistake in this para ...

K> My mistake yes POP3 not POP, type lazyness :(

The mistake I was referring to was the blurring of the line between
incoming and outgoing protocols. You were inferring that you were
using POP for outgoing mail. I described the protocols to make it
clear that SMTP was for outbound and POP for inbound. I wasn't worried
about the missing '3' - it's a valid shorthand.

-- 
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA / TBTECH 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com      ]
[    Any opinions are my own and not those of RIT labs           ]

TB! v1.52 Beta/1 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1

-- 
______________________________________________________
Archives   : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

You are subscribed as : [email protected]


Reply via email to