Hi Januk,
thanks I've got it sussed and it's working really well ;-) thanks for
your help
Tuesday, June 05, 2001, 12:15:05 PM, you wrote:
JA> Hello andrew,
JA> Historians believe that Tue, 5 Jun 2001 at 10:02 GMT +0100 was when,
JA> andrew [A] typed the following:
A>> we should edit this to be in my case :-
A>> String: ^in-reply-to.+@andema\.co.uk>$
A>> is that right?
JA> That will work.
JA> Just a tiny note: . alone means any character, that's why
JA> Allie had put \. for the first period. \. means you want the
JA> period character, and not any character. Confused?
JA> As written, your regular expression will match:
JA> in-reply-to: (something)@andema.coTuk>
JA> You can replace the (something) with any string, and the T can be
JA> *any* single character.
JA> Change the regexp to: ^in-reply-to.+@andema\.co\.uk>$
JA> Now you can only match:
JA> in-reply-to: (something)@andema.co.uk>
JA> In this case, the difference is fairly trivial, but sometimes it's not
JA> so trivial.
JA> According to the list rules, this conversation is a bit too technical
JA> for this list. If you'd like to continue the discussion, we should
JA> really move to TBTECH or off-list.
--
thanks,
andrew mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
