On 20-06-2001 at 11:59, Dierk Haasis kindly wrote:
> Hello andrew!
>> Can I just clarify. Do we like a tag that is related to the subject
>> of the mail? I would imagine it would be pretty useful. So we don't
>> have a problem?
> The original posting from Karin spoke against it - and on good
> grounds.
Uhm, I didn't speak against it. Actually, I love these
quotes that match content. And my original question was
mostly meant as entertainment for the list.
> Whenever I stumble upon a tag line I consider to be too aggressive or
> misplaced in the context, I tend to either open a new message, delete
> the line or just plain apologize beforehand. until now it has only be
> a problem with a certain lady, or actually my perception of her.
For sigs that are all too blatent within the context, I
created a quick template ("sig") that redoes my whole
signature: initial, delimiter, new cookie.
<g> Talking about upsetting people that you care about, look
what TB came up with this time:
- K -
--
As you go on living with someone, you slowly lose the power
to make them happy, while your capacity to hurt them remains
undiminished.
- Julian Barnes: Talking it Over
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
