Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, July 17, 2001, 6:59:14 AM, you wrote:
TF> Hi Miles,
TF> On Tue, 17 Jul 2001 06:51:43 -0400GMT (17/07/2001, 18:51 +0800GMT),
TF> Miles Alexander wrote:
MA>> So: any transactions that are made *same* day are treated w/o a
MA>> date and *just* the time?
TF> No, they are correctly treated with today's date. Only the date is not
TF> displayed, so today's mails are easier to spot.
MA>> May I ask why this is done and how I should sort *if* the actual date
MA>> is missing and replaced with the TIME?
TF> It is not missing. It is just not displayed. All sorting by received
TF> or created date/time still works perfectly.
I guess a little RTFM would help then. (lol)
--
Best regards,
Miles mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
