-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Op donderdag 13 september 2001 schreef Leif Gregory:
> But to answer your question, the signature is from a X.509
> certificate issued through Thawte, and is more or less a digital
> signature saying the message came from me (or at least my machine),
> and that nothing was altered in the message.
leif,
i saw you were using *both* the PGP and the S/MIME signature. isn't
that rather an overkill?
and, of the 7435 bytes of your original message 3125 bytes were taken
up by that S/MIME signature. that is over 40% in this particular case,
which was a rather long mail. i find that number ridiculous, which is
my general argument against using S/MIME for signing messages.
in my opinion the PGP signature is cleaner and smaller (and inline!
didn't list policy dictate 'no attachments'?), so that one is and
always will be my favorite.
Mrten.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5i
iQA/AwUBO6D6EcxmXGfKa+lHEQLs+wCgw7XgaMtscEW9gSoo0MJ+tzkMIUUAnRy4
G2OhRfhn9orU9j/c1wIrSbIA
=W5PG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
________________________________________________________
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
