-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Carren,
On 05 October 2001 at 15:46:19 +1200 (which was 04:46 where I live) Carren wrote to Thomas F and made these points: C> I am sorry, but I thought that if I used the same subject line - Re: C> Automatic connection, that it would have threaded OK. That is why I C> put that in the subject line....is the assumption that it would C> thread not correct? Most folks here use "Thread by reference" because that provides full indentation and a clear trail of exactly which reply is to which message. The simplest way of providing a full reference in a thread is to "Reply" to a message. The other way is to artificially construct the "Follow-up" message ID data. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \ BrainStorm - free thinking - www: http://www.brainstormsw.com / \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com / ' SB! v1.54/9/iKey1000-55238-48F0B on Windows NT 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) Comment: GPG Sealed for freshness iD8DBQE7vTF7OeQkq5KdzaARAqjhAKDxRT+0wH26aamwK0Kc9cV2jm4ZowCgheui rFa+eKX8w1NECBoC6t+ypEY= =rwmY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
